<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>Rowland Institute Library Blog &#187; rihlibStories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/category/rihlibstories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib</link>
	<description>Just another Weblogs at Harvard Law School weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Oxford Scientist Launches Sharp Critique of Religion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/oxford-scientist-launches-sharp-critique-of-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/oxford-scientist-launches-sharp-critique-of-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rihlib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rihlibStories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/oxford-scientist-launches-sharp-critiq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It was standing room only at Lowell Hall yesterday evening and a line of would-be attendees (myself included) went around the block.  Did anyone hear Dawkins&#8217;s talk yesterday?  Luckily a Crimson writer got in and summarized it, saying that Dawkins refers to religion as a &#8220;virus,&#8221; not a function of evolution and &#8220;devise&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a10'></a></p>
<p>It was standing room only at Lowell Hall yesterday evening and a line of would-be attendees (myself included) went around the block.  Did anyone hear Dawkins&#8217;s talk yesterday?  Luckily a Crimson writer got in and summarized it, saying that Dawkins refers to religion as a &#8220;virus,&#8221; not a function of evolution and &#8220;devise&#8221; and socially &#8220;costly.&#8221; It would be interesting to know his views on specific religions; I wonder if he treats them too generally, or if he ever read anything like James&#8217;s &#8220;The Varieties of Religious Experience&#8221; or Ian Barbour&#8217;s &#8220;Religion and Science,&#8221; not that these would change his mind, just broaden it, perhaps.  The second lecture is today at 5, same place.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/oxford-scientist-launches-sharp-critique-of-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Preventable&#8221; Failures Caused U.S. Blackout</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/preventable-failures-caused-us-blackout/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/preventable-failures-caused-us-blackout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rihlib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rihlibStories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/preventable-failures-caused-us-blackou</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
New Scientist posts an article about a report from the US-Canada Power System Outage Task Force which states that many utilities did not keep up with the standards of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC); if they had, the largest power outage in U.S. history might have been avoided, says the task force.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a9'></a></p>
<p>New Scientist posts an article about a report from the US-Canada Power System Outage Task Force which states that many utilities did not keep up with the standards of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC); if they had, the largest power outage in U.S. history might have been avoided, says the task force.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/preventable-failures-caused-us-blackout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Road to a Great Presentation &#8211; Step One: Care About Your Audience</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/on-the-road-to-a-great-presentation-step-one-care-about-your-audien/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/on-the-road-to-a-great-presentation-step-one-care-about-your-audien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rihlib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rihlibStories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/on-the-road-to-a-great-presentation-st</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Address real people and real issues and think of questions ahead of time, this article in Today&#8217;s Engineer urges (Source: WHAT&#8217;S NEW @ IEEE IN COMPUTING)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a8'></a></p>
<p>Address real people and real issues and think of questions ahead of time, this article in Today&#8217;s Engineer urges (Source: WHAT&#8217;S NEW @ IEEE IN COMPUTING)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/20/on-the-road-to-a-great-presentation-step-one-care-about-your-audien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Competition in biology; It&#8217;s a scoop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/competition-in-biology-its-a-scoop/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/competition-in-biology-its-a-scoop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rihlib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rihlibStories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/competition-in-biology-its-a-scoop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A Nature news article examines the appearance of increasing competitiveness in the life sciences, a push to get results out as fast as possible in pursuit of grants, tenure, prestige and other aims.  A story is told of a couple that presented a poster and published their results, just barely ahead of four other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a7'></a></p>
<p>A Nature news article examines the appearance of increasing competitiveness in the life sciences, a push to get results out as fast as possible in pursuit of grants, tenure, prestige and other aims.  A story is told of a couple that presented a poster and published their results, just barely ahead of four other groups that learned of their techniques through their conference presentation.  Are carelessness and sloppy research on the increase as a result, or are there just isolated phenomena.  (Karel Svoboda, formerly of Howard Berg&#8217;s lab at Rowland/Harvard, is among those quoted)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/competition-in-biology-its-a-scoop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Favorite Science Scams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/favorite-science-scams/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/favorite-science-scams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rihlib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rihlibStories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/favorite-science-scams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A Guardian article lists ten hoaxes and forgeries, some better known and more recent such as Jan Henrik Sch
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a6'></a></p>
<p>A Guardian article lists ten hoaxes and forgeries, some better known and more recent such as Jan Henrik Sch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/19/favorite-science-scams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New blog home</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/18/new-blog-home/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/18/new-blog-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rihlib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rihlibStories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/18/new-blog-home/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;ve moved the library weblog over to Harvard Law and am having a go with their Manila software.   Read earlier postings at&#160;http://rihlib.blogspot.com, where I will continue to archive them &#8230;
Rowland members, anyone with a Harvard e-mail address can join this community and start a weblog.  Go to the Weblogs at Harvard Law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a5'></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve moved the library weblog over to Harvard Law and am having a go with their Manila software.   Read earlier postings at&nbsp;<a href="http://rihlib.blogspot.com" title="http://rihlib.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://rihlib.blogspot.com</a>, where I will continue to archive them &#8230;</p>
<p>Rowland members, anyone with a Harvard e-mail address can join this community and start a weblog.  Go to <a>the Weblogs at Harvard Law site</a>, register and browse their help files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/11/18/new-blog-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Worked!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/10/31/it-worked-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/10/31/it-worked-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rihlib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rihlibStories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/10/31/it-worked-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Welcome to your new weblog. This is the first post to prove that it worked. Click on the title of this item for tips on getting started with your new weblog.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a4'></a></p>
<p>Welcome to your new weblog. This is the first post to prove that it worked. Click on the title of this item for tips on getting started with your new weblog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/rihlib/2003/10/31/it-worked-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
