Rowland Institute Library Blog

A news article offers several examples of videoblogging, integrating
text and video content in a blog, whether it be images from remote Peru
or the Democratic National Convention.   (Source: Steve
Garfield)

Yes, it can happen.  Proprietors of some popular blogs talk about
the difficulties juggling blog and work and family and other
things.  Some get caught up in the hype instead of worrying about
“what is to be done.” (Source: Furdlog)

I enjoy Rory Litwin’s Library Juice, a one-of-a-kind, bi-weekly
newsletter that focuses on progressive issues in librarianship,
especially intellectual freedom.  It’s wonderful reading and Rory
is much to be praised for his time and ingenuity.  The following
paragraph  made me pause, however:

“… so many people, librarians included, have started
their own blogs for no discernible reason and through blogs have
renewed their irrational excitement about the Web in general.  It
appears to me that in most cases where someone has started a blog that
is useful, it would be more useful if it were not a blog but a website
with a different structure.  I say this because if there is one
thing that is essential about blogs, that they all have in common, it
is not the ease of updating them, not RSS feeds, not the ability to
post comments, and not the capability of having a community of users
add content. It is the chronological structure.  Many people are
now using the blog format where a chronological organization is not
appropriate to the content they are putting up, for no other reason
than that blogs are hot and there are services supporting them.
 This is irrational.  I feel that librarians should be a
little more mature and less inclined to fall for Internet crazes like
this.  That is not to say that a blog is never a useful thing,
only that blogs - as everything on the web - should be seen for what
they are and not in terms of a pre-existing
enthusiasm.”

Some of what Rory says is well taken, particularly that we should not
be quick “to fall for Internet crazes.”  However, all the elements
he names (RSS feeds, community, content) work in concert with
chronology; none necessarily trumps the other. And blogs are certainly
easier to maintain than websites.  A lot of librarians don’t have
access to
their own servers or may have to fight battles with IT departments to
put up content, not that my own situation reflects that. And a blog,
not just being something “hot,” is
dynamic and can promote the library’s services.  Most of
the blogs that I read either promote a special topic (e.g. Library
Stuff, the (sci-tech) Library Question, Kept-up Academic Librarian,
Library Stuff, Open Access News, Research Buzz) or a personal viewpoint
on selective topics
(Confessions of a Science Librarian, Christina’s Library Rant, j’s
scratchpad, to name only a few.)  (And what’s the matter with RSS
feeds, anyway?)  Besides, is the chronological
format ideal for Library Juice?  It has been operating in
blog-like fashion, albeit edited and consolidated with considerable
care.  Finally I would take from Rory’s comments that the
chronology and the content must work together.  Whatever we put in
our blogs shouldn’t be left to rot and should be reasonably, easily
accessible (I have a lot of work to do on the latter,
admittedly.)  Librarians should blog, but also keep in mind
potential audience, and Walt Crawford’s dictum “First have something to
say.” 

or just musings of a killjoy… ;)  (Source: Betsy Devine)

Are bloggers a gold mine for literary agents or can few write more than a lengthy posting?  (Source: Library Stuff)

MT and Bloxsom are the only ones familiar to me.  Good breakdown of features to consider.  (Source: The Virtual Chase)

Quite positive, in fact. “Our internal use of Weblogs has greatly accelerated, and we’re beginning to see more tangible benefits as we’ve begun to reach
a critical mass of internal contributors.” (Source: beSpacific)

James Fallows has discovered RSS, among other things.  He has a
question for publishers, noting “Information is both invaluable and
impossible to value.”  He cites the phenomenon of the give-away
culture, exemplified in free web sites, blogs, and more or less the
open access movement.  Who’s going to pay for information if it is
free?  Well, for a long time libraries paid for information that
was made freely available to the general public, albeit with greater or
lesser convenience to the individual.  Now, there’s more material
freely available and at increasing convenience, depending on the speed
and stability of one’s internet connection.  But publishers and
libraries still provide value by collecting and organizing disparate
data.  What the price of that should be is another question. 
Many believe that the free, open source, file sharing, whatever you
want to call it, movements harm those who are simply trying to make a
living or cover costs (small companies, scientific societies,
independent artists) and will not harm those who are making
astronomical profits (the record companies, the Microsofts, the
Elseviers.)  Maybe we need to educate others about choices, and
some can play a role in that, rather than attacking the open movements
in fear of losing what they little they have. For example, it seems
that scientific societies have in interest in open access rather than
dismissing it.  Fallows (oh yeah, that’s what started this) ends
on an optimistic note (but not for the “middlemen”:”No matter how that
battle turns out, the public will win the longer war.  The
Internet’s impact on the value of information may still be in flux, but
its long-term impact on middlemen is clear.” Maybe it isn’t so much
elimination of the “middlemen” but those who would profit extravagantly
and serve their shareholders first.  (Sources; Open Access News; Bob Stepno)

Online Journalism Review has another interesting article this week on
blogging and its acceptance in academia.  Four prof bloggers are
interviewed, including LSU’s Kaye Trammell. (Source:
blogdex)

Finally a blog directory with a significant number of science-oriented
news sources and weblogs.  Categories include natural sciences
(physics, chemistry, astronomy); health and medicine; technology; and
even libraries.  Resources range from news to personal weblogs to
weblogs for institutions and labs. Some are field specific (e.g. mass
spectrometry blog.) Many non-English sites.   A find. 
(Source: Confessions of a Science Librarian)