<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: real estate &#8220;broker&#8221; updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/12/real-estate-broker-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/12/real-estate-broker-updates/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: raubin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/12/real-estate-broker-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>raubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/12/real-estate-broker-updates/#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, your laws for real estate are completely different to how we work here. The law on real estate agency practice in the states should be brought in over here, which would change the face of the property market for one and make it fairer to the customer as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, your laws for real estate are completely different to how we work here. The law on real estate agency practice in the states should be brought in over here, which would change the face of the property market for one and make it fairer to the customer as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; realtors fight unbundling (and pols help them)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/12/real-estate-broker-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; realtors fight unbundling (and pols help them)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/12/real-estate-broker-updates/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] update (Oct. 12, 2006): According to Mark Nadel&#8217;s AEI-Brookings Article on real estate broker commissions, discussed at length in our update post, there are seventeen states with minimum services laws that restrict unbundling: Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin.   [thanks to David Fischer at Antitrust Review weblog for pointing to this post] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] update (Oct. 12, 2006): According to Mark Nadel&#8217;s AEI-Brookings Article on real estate broker commissions, discussed at length in our update post, there are seventeen states with minimum services laws that restrict unbundling: Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin.   [thanks to David Fischer at Antitrust Review weblog for pointing to this post] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
