<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: whaddayaknow about Fair Use and Copyright?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; two cents and more for a Monday morning</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; two cents and more for a Monday morning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-795</guid>
		<description>[...] If the House Republican Study Committee spent a few minutes studying shlep  (e.g., see &#8221;copy permission and copyfraud&#8221; and &#8220;fair use and copyright&#8220;), it wouldn&#8217;t have falsely accused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of &#8220;pirating&#8221; 16 clips of House floor debate that had appeared on C-Span, when she included them on her weblog The Gavel.   See today&#8217;s New York Times, &#8220;Which Videos Are Protected? Lawmakers Get a Lesson,&#8221; Feb. 26, 2007.  Although NYT says that members of Congress are &#8220;learning the complexities of copyright law, much the way the casual YouTube user has learned,&#8221; the relevant point here is really not all that complex: &#8220;works&#8221; made by the federal government (such as shots taken by House cameras on the floor) are in the public domain.  On the other hand, C-Span asserts its copyright over materials shot by its own cameras at other congressional functions.  If the Study Committee needs a bit of fast cribbing, it might try either the podcast or transcript of Nolo.com&#8217;s piece &#8220;Blogs, Websites and Podcasts: When Do You Need Permission?&#8221;   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If the House Republican Study Committee spent a few minutes studying shlep  (e.g., see &#8221;copy permission and copyfraud&#8221; and &#8220;fair use and copyright&#8220;), it wouldn&#8217;t have falsely accused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of &#8220;pirating&#8221; 16 clips of House floor debate that had appeared on C-Span, when she included them on her weblog The Gavel.   See today&#8217;s New York Times, &#8220;Which Videos Are Protected? Lawmakers Get a Lesson,&#8221; Feb. 26, 2007.  Although NYT says that members of Congress are &#8220;learning the complexities of copyright law, much the way the casual YouTube user has learned,&#8221; the relevant point here is really not all that complex: &#8220;works&#8221; made by the federal government (such as shots taken by House cameras on the floor) are in the public domain.  On the other hand, C-Span asserts its copyright over materials shot by its own cameras at other congressional functions.  If the Study Committee needs a bit of fast cribbing, it might try either the podcast or transcript of&nbsp;<a href="http://Nolo.com" title="http://Nolo. " target="_blank">Nolo.com</a>&#8217;s piece &#8220;Blogs, Websites and Podcasts: When Do You Need Permission?&#8221;   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebyblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Quickies for Dec 29 - Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>ebyblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Quickies for Dec 29 - Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-474</guid>
		<description>[...] Some resources on fair-use and copyright are always handy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some resources on fair-use and copyright are always handy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; not adverse to poetic legal guides</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; not adverse to poetic legal guides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-288</guid>
		<description>[...] While that is a reasonable summary, go here for a few extra resources on the complex topic of Fair Use and Copyright. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While that is a reasonable summary, go here for a few extra resources on the complex topic of Fair Use and Copyright. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging and Copyright &#171; LDS Law</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging and Copyright &#171; LDS Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-275</guid>
		<description>[...] Several prominent law bloggers have noticed a few over-zealous legal disclaimers on popular blogs and Web pages around the Internet. Most notably, the North Country Gazette made this disclaimer with regards to its content: In accordance with Fair Use of Copyright: WE FORBID ANY REPRODUCTION in part or in whole of The North Country Gazette. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Several prominent law bloggers have noticed a few over-zealous legal disclaimers on popular blogs and Web pages around the Internet. Most notably, the North Country Gazette made this disclaimer with regards to its content: In accordance with Fair Use of Copyright: WE FORBID ANY REPRODUCTION in part or in whole of The North Country Gazette. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maxam&#8217;s Gazette Removes Fair Use Disclaimer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maxam&#8217;s Gazette Removes Fair Use Disclaimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] A Google News Alert for &#8220;pro se&#8221; brought me to June Maxam&#8217;s North Country Gazette this morning &#8212; my first stop there since questioning, in a series of postings last month, NCG&#8217;s claim that &#8220;Fair Use is not applicable&#8221; to the copyrighted material appearing at that site.  The Nov. 21st NCG&#8217;s article is about Florida Judge Cliff Barnes, who is representing himself before the State&#8217;s Judicial Qualifications Commission.  The Barnes story is interesting, and concerns public complaints he made about the conduct of other judges, local enforcement officers, and the public defender.  (Read more here and here.)  The judge seems more than capable of presenting his own case, so the story does not particularly deserve a lot of shlep attention.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Google News Alert for &#8220;pro se&#8221; brought me to June Maxam&#8217;s North Country Gazette this morning &#8212; my first stop there since questioning, in a series of postings last month, NCG&#8217;s claim that &#8220;Fair Use is not applicable&#8221; to the copyrighted material appearing at that site.  The Nov. 21st NCG&#8217;s article is about Florida Judge Cliff Barnes, who is representing himself before the State&#8217;s Judicial Qualifications Commission.  The Barnes story is interesting, and concerns public complaints he made about the conduct of other judges, local enforcement officers, and the public defender.  (Read more here and here.)  The judge seems more than capable of presenting his own case, so the story does not particularly deserve a lot of shlep attention.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aTypical Joe: A gay New Yorker living in the rural south.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>aTypical Joe: A gay New Yorker living in the rural south.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-227</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sherman&#039;s freedom is just another word for so much less to choose...&lt;/strong&gt;

I saw RIAA President Cary Sherman&#039;s perspective on fair use and the Consumer Electronics Association&#039;s &quot;Digital Freedom&quot; campaign in CNet this morning. And watched for a good rebuttal: We&#039;ve noted for some time that one problem in the ongoing batt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sherman&#8217;s freedom is just another word for so much less to choose&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I saw RIAA President Cary Sherman&#8217;s perspective on fair use and the Consumer Electronics Association&#8217;s &#8220;Digital Freedom&#8221; campaign in CNet this morning. And watched for a good rebuttal: We&#8217;ve noted for some time that one problem in the ongoing batt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPTAblog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>IPTAblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-158</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quick Links...&lt;/strong&gt;

WSJ Law Blog: Jimi Hendrix Steals the Show At Intellectual Property Auction: &quot;Whoever bought this bought themselves the right to be a litigant.” Google offers a handy guide on how to non-generically verbify the Google mark. Yes, that last sentence.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quick Links&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>WSJ Law Blog: Jimi Hendrix Steals the Show At Intellectual Property Auction: &#8220;Whoever bought this bought themselves the right to be a litigant.” Google offers a handy guide on how to non-generically verbify the Google mark. Yes, that last sentence&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overlawyered</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Overlawyered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-150</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;This article is copyright protected. Fair Use is not applicable.&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Eugene Volokh has a good laugh at the expense of an upstate New York publication called the North Country Gazette (Oct. 23 and 25). More: I should have made clear that it was David Giacalone......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;This article is copyright protected. Fair Use is not applicable.&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Eugene Volokh has a good laugh at the expense of an upstate New York publication called the North Country Gazette (Oct. 23 and 25). More: I should have made clear that it was David Giacalone&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; copy permission and copyfraud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; copy permission and copyfraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-147</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;shlep&lt;/em&gt; posting by david giacalone - October 28, 2006 @ 2:20 pm ·</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>shlep</em> posting by david giacalone &#8211; October 28, 2006 @ 2:20 pm ·</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilrabbitfoofoo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>lilrabbitfoofoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/23/whaddayaknow-about-fair-use-and-copyrig#comment-145</guid>
		<description>june maxim . . . . . . on a terri schiavo AOL messageboard, we&#039;ve tried discussing her ..... &#039;journalism&quot; and recieved threatening emails for just discussing her writing. she claims we cant even discuss her work, that its &quot;slander&quot; or &quot;libel&quot; and &quot;her attorneys are monitoring the aol boards and our isp&#039;s have been recorded&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>june maxim . . . . . . on a terri schiavo AOL messageboard, we&#8217;ve tried discussing her &#8230;.. &#8216;journalism&#8221; and recieved threatening emails for just discussing her writing. she claims we cant even discuss her work, that its &#8220;slander&#8221; or &#8220;libel&#8221; and &#8220;her attorneys are monitoring the aol boards and our isp&#8217;s have been recorded&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
