<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCG has improved its copyright warning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>david giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>See &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/22/maxams-gazette-removes-fair-use-disclaimer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Maxam&#039;s Gazette Removes Fair Use Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;.  I hope this happy ending lasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/22/maxams-gazette-removes-fair-use-disclaimer/" rel="nofollow">Maxam&#8217;s Gazette Removes Fair Use Disclaimer</a>.  I hope this happy ending lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Headlines</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can You Sue For Defamation If Someone Points Out Publicly That You Are Wrong?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Remember the publication that put legal statements on its site claiming that fair use did not apply and...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can You Sue For Defamation If Someone Points Out Publicly That You Are Wrong?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Remember the publication that put legal statements on its site claiming that fair use did not apply and&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; it&#8217;s back: Maxam again claims &#8220;Fair Use is not applicable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; it&#8217;s back: Maxam again claims &#8220;Fair Use is not applicable&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/25/ncg-has-improved-its-copyright-warning/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] david giacalone - October 26, 2006 @ 10:25 am &#183; News Items     After posting her news articles for one day without claiming that &#8220;Fair Use is not applicable&#8221; (see our prior post yesterday), June Maxam of the North Country Gazette has re-inserted that erroneous assertion in NCG&#8217;s copyright warning in pieces put online on October 25, 2006.  For example, look at the bottome of this editorial, and this, this, and that news article.  Maybe such obliviousness-stubborness is why she is on Libertarian Rick Stanley&#8217;s Patriot A List, which honors &#8220;Patriots who do more than talk about standing up to those in government that are operating outside the law or under color of law.&#8220;  Note: Ms. Maxam   changed: This article is copyright protected and Fair Use is not applicable.   to: This article is copyright protected. Fair Use is not applicable.   Even if psychologists can&#8217;t offer long-distance analysis, we&#8217;d like to know from legal textual experts and our linguist friends at Language Log whether turning the two clauses into two sentences makes an important difference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] david giacalone &#8211; October 26, 2006 @ 10:25 am &#183; News Items     After posting her news articles for one day without claiming that &#8220;Fair Use is not applicable&#8221; (see our prior post yesterday), June Maxam of the North Country Gazette has re-inserted that erroneous assertion in NCG&#8217;s copyright warning in pieces put online on October 25, 2006.  For example, look at the bottome of this editorial, and this, this, and that news article.  Maybe such obliviousness-stubborness is why she is on Libertarian Rick Stanley&#8217;s Patriot A List, which honors &#8220;Patriots who do more than talk about standing up to those in government that are operating outside the law or under color of law.&#8220;  Note: Ms. Maxam   changed: This article is copyright protected and Fair Use is not applicable.   to: This article is copyright protected. Fair Use is not applicable.   Even if psychologists can&#8217;t offer long-distance analysis, we&#8217;d like to know from legal textual experts and our linguist friends at Language Log whether turning the two clauses into two sentences makes an important difference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
