<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Easier to Read?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/27/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-easier-to-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/27/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-easier-to-read/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MaryWhisner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/27/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-easier-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryWhisner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/27/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-easier#comment-345</guid>
		<description>Orijit,

You can get more information by reading the transmittal letter &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uscourts.gov/rules/Appendix_D.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. 

The letter describes the process of drafting. Bryan A. Garner, an expert on legal writing (see his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawprose.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;), started them off with a first draft and drafting guidelines. Prof. R. Joseph Kimble, who teaches legal writing at Thomas M. Cooley Law School, played a strong role. 

The letter mentions Prof. Stephen B. Burbank (University of Pennsylvania) and Gregory Joseph, Esq., who organized a committee (11 law professors and 10 practitioners) to review the draft and offer comments. Information about that committee is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.upenn.edu/fac/sburbank/RestylingProject.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. There you&#039;ll find a link to the committee&#039;s detailed comments.

I hope you find this helpful. -- Mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orijit,</p>
<p>You can get more information by reading the transmittal letter <a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/rules/Appendix_D.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>. </p>
<p>The letter describes the process of drafting. Bryan A. Garner, an expert on legal writing (see his <a href="http://www.lawprose.org" rel="nofollow">website</a>), started them off with a first draft and drafting guidelines. Prof. R. Joseph Kimble, who teaches legal writing at Thomas M. Cooley Law School, played a strong role. </p>
<p>The letter mentions Prof. Stephen B. Burbank (University of Pennsylvania) and Gregory Joseph, Esq., who organized a committee (11 law professors and 10 practitioners) to review the draft and offer comments. Information about that committee is <a href="http://www.law.upenn.edu/fac/sburbank/RestylingProject.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. There you&#8217;ll find a link to the committee&#8217;s detailed comments.</p>
<p>I hope you find this helpful. &#8212; Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orijit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/27/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-easier-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Orijit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/11/27/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-easier#comment-295</guid>
		<description>The changes certainly make the rules much easier to read for self-represented litigants. Do you happen to know how &#039;the group within the Civil Rules Advisory Committee&#039; makes their decisions? It seems as though they received public comments on the &#039;Style Project&#039;, it would be interesting to find those comments and any surveys conducted to come up with the recommendations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The changes certainly make the rules much easier to read for self-represented litigants. Do you happen to know how &#8216;the group within the Civil Rules Advisory Committee&#8217; makes their decisions? It seems as though they received public comments on the &#8216;Style Project&#8217;, it would be interesting to find those comments and any surveys conducted to come up with the recommendations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
