<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pro se recycling goes Over and Above</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/12/19/pro-se-recycling-goes-over-and-above/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/12/19/pro-se-recycling-goes-over-and-above/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; like a regifted fruit cake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/12/19/pro-se-recycling-goes-over-and-above/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; like a regifted fruit cake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/12/19/pro-se-recycling-goes-over-and-above/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>[...]    In a post Friday morning at Overlawyered.com, titled &#8220;Teri Smith Tyler v. Carter, pro se&#8221; (Dec. 22, 2006), Walter Olson outdid his website teammate Ted Frank&#8217;s recent recycling of stale pro se case.  As we noted four days ago, Ted spotlighted the &#8220;whacky,&#8221; two-year-old, Ward v. Arm &amp; Hammer case last week (as did ATL&#8217;s David Lat).  Walter took his time machine back yet another decade, after a reader reminded him of the Tyler case (opinion, 151 F.R.D. 537), which was decided in the Southern District of New York in 1993.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    In a post Friday morning at&nbsp;<a href="http://Overlawyered.com" title="http://Overlawyered. " target="_blank">Overlawyered.com</a>, titled &#8220;Teri Smith Tyler v. Carter, pro se&#8221; (Dec. 22, 2006), Walter Olson outdid his website teammate Ted Frank&#8217;s recent recycling of stale pro se case.  As we noted four days ago, Ted spotlighted the &#8220;whacky,&#8221; two-year-old, Ward v. Arm &amp; Hammer case last week (as did ATL&#8217;s David Lat).  Walter took his time machine back yet another decade, after a reader reminded him of the Tyler case (opinion, 151 F.R.D. 537), which was decided in the Southern District of New York in 1993.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
