<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Chief Justice has a lot to say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/02/27/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/02/27/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-say/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie Russell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/02/27/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-say/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/02/27/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-s#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Oh Please.  In the area of Family&#039;s California&#039;s top jurist doesn&#039;t know squat, not to put too fine a point on it.  I&#039;m sure he&#039;s a nice man but please.  Last year he awarded the Benjamin Arana ACCESS to Justice award (for the poor) to LA judge Aviva Bobb.

Keeping in mind its ACCESS to justice, it was Judge Bobb who denied a little girl her voice in Family Court when the child expressed fears of her father.  Judge Bobb didn&#039;t want to hear her.  So the child&#039;s mother suggested a letter.  After the father killed his daughter then himself, the Court&#039;s spokesperson Blamed the little girl for writing what the court thought was a &quot;contrived&quot; letter.

Yes, they blamed the now dead Eleven year old for not writing a better letter.

And ask Judge George why child molestors are still on the bench.  For details see www.FamilyLawCourts.com/judging.html

Chief Justice Ronald George seems like a nice enough man, but so completely clueless in this area.  Which makes sense.  His lifetime has been spent working for the State and thus has only been listening to state employees.  So the man had no chance to actually learn how truly bad the Family Court system is.

Then of course, the one court most often used by the public, and for the longest period of time, isn&#039;t covered by media, so good thing for the internet.  Now it&#039;s even possible to learn how profitable for the police, domestic violence is.
(see the domestic violence section of the site) and by the way, can anyone guess why reporters call &quot;murder&quot; &quot;domestic violence?&quot;

It&#039;s all about the non-profits.  Oh yes, and they don&#039;t work either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Please.  In the area of Family&#8217;s California&#8217;s top jurist doesn&#8217;t know squat, not to put too fine a point on it.  I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s a nice man but please.  Last year he awarded the Benjamin Arana ACCESS to Justice award (for the poor) to LA judge Aviva Bobb.</p>
<p>Keeping in mind its ACCESS to justice, it was Judge Bobb who denied a little girl her voice in Family Court when the child expressed fears of her father.  Judge Bobb didn&#8217;t want to hear her.  So the child&#8217;s mother suggested a letter.  After the father killed his daughter then himself, the Court&#8217;s spokesperson Blamed the little girl for writing what the court thought was a &#8220;contrived&#8221; letter.</p>
<p>Yes, they blamed the now dead Eleven year old for not writing a better letter.</p>
<p>And ask Judge George why child molestors are still on the bench.  For details see <a href="http://www.FamilyLawCourts.com/judging.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.FamilyLawCourts.com/judging.html</a></p>
<p>Chief Justice Ronald George seems like a nice enough man, but so completely clueless in this area.  Which makes sense.  His lifetime has been spent working for the State and thus has only been listening to state employees.  So the man had no chance to actually learn how truly bad the Family Court system is.</p>
<p>Then of course, the one court most often used by the public, and for the longest period of time, isn&#8217;t covered by media, so good thing for the internet.  Now it&#8217;s even possible to learn how profitable for the police, domestic violence is.<br />
(see the domestic violence section of the site) and by the way, can anyone guess why reporters call &#8220;murder&#8221; &#8220;domestic violence?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about the non-profits.  Oh yes, and they don&#8217;t work either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OGhoshal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/02/27/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-say/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>OGhoshal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/02/27/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-s#comment-814</guid>
		<description>David,
      Thanks for highlighting the work of some of my fellow AmeriCorps Members. JusticeCorps is an exciting development in the link between our Nation&#039;s community service desires and legal needs. Although we currently lack the funding and admnistrative capcity to run the program through Montana Legal Service Association, we have explored funding through the Courts System and some other legal community stakeholders. I&#039;m glad to hear that the program&#039;s success is appreciated by the California Courts and their litigants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
      Thanks for highlighting the work of some of my fellow AmeriCorps Members. JusticeCorps is an exciting development in the link between our Nation&#8217;s community service desires and legal needs. Although we currently lack the funding and admnistrative capcity to run the program through Montana Legal Service Association, we have explored funding through the Courts System and some other legal community stakeholders. I&#8217;m glad to hear that the program&#8217;s success is appreciated by the California Courts and their litigants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
