<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the dis-accessed middle class of North America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/10/the-dis-accessed-middle-class-of-north-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/10/the-dis-accessed-middle-class-of-north-america/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the Florida Bar and you the people</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/10/the-dis-accessed-middle-class-of-north-america/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the Florida Bar and you the people</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/10/the-dis-accessed-middle-class-of-north-#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s no secret that I am at times suspicious of the motives of the organized bar &#8212; especially when it comes to new sources of competition from outside (or even inside) the profession, and to the growth of the self-help law movement.  See, e.g., our post &#8220;a guide or a guild: where does your bar group stand?&#8221; (Sept. 8, 2006).  So, I was not very impressed by the Florida Bar&#8217;s UPL chairman&#8217;s suggestion that those who need &#8220;to save money&#8221; can get help from Legal Aid.  As you know, only a small portion of the total population who cannot afford lawyers (see prior post) is poor enough to be eligible for Legal Aid; and, of course, only a relatively small percentage of the eligible actually get a lawyer from Legal Aid.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s no secret that I am at times suspicious of the motives of the organized bar &#8212; especially when it comes to new sources of competition from outside (or even inside) the profession, and to the growth of the self-help law movement.  See, e.g., our post &#8220;a guide or a guild: where does your bar group stand?&#8221; (Sept. 8, 2006).  So, I was not very impressed by the Florida Bar&#8217;s UPL chairman&#8217;s suggestion that those who need &#8220;to save money&#8221; can get help from Legal Aid.  As you know, only a small portion of the total population who cannot afford lawyers (see prior post) is poor enough to be eligible for Legal Aid; and, of course, only a relatively small percentage of the eligible actually get a lawyer from Legal Aid.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
