<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California judges get Benchbook for handling pro se litigants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/21/california-judges-get-benchbook-for-handling-pro-se-litigants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/21/california-judges-get-benchbook-for-handling-pro-se-litigants/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Delso ghostwriter update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/21/california-judges-get-benchbook-for-handling-pro-se-litigants/comment-page-1/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Delso ghostwriter update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/03/21/california-judges-get-benchbook-for-han#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>[...] A few days ago, we collected a number of major resources on the topic of the judicial treatment of the pro se litigant.  See Californa judges get benchbook for handling pro se litigants (March 23, 2007)   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few days ago, we collected a number of major resources on the topic of the judicial treatment of the pro se litigant.  See Californa judges get benchbook for handling pro se litigants (March 23, 2007)   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
