<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: grand re-opening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-1968</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/#comment-1968</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good thing David Giaclone packed up his bags and left. He&#039;s a disgrace to the legal field and it&#039;s pretty obvious why he&#039;s not practicing. This blog thing needs to disappear
&lt;blockquote&gt;[&lt;em&gt;Note from the retiring Editor&lt;/em&gt;: I see that this lovely comment is from &quot;cpe-24-29-90-249.nycap.res.rr.com.&quot;  It is quite reminiscent of the unfriendly comments from &quot;LegalEagle&quot; that were left in response to our posting back in October 2006 on Fair Use and the misinterpretation of that doctrine at the &lt;em&gt;North Country Gazette&lt;/em&gt;.  See my reaction at that time in &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/26/its-back-maxam-again-claims-fair-use-is-not-applicable/#comment-151&quot;&gt;this Comment&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good thing David Giaclone packed up his bags and left. He&#8217;s a disgrace to the legal field and it&#8217;s pretty obvious why he&#8217;s not practicing. This blog thing needs to disappear</p>
<blockquote><p>[<em>Note from the retiring Editor</em>: I see that this lovely comment is from "cpe-24-29-90-249.nycap.res.rr.com."  It is quite reminiscent of the unfriendly comments from "LegalEagle" that were left in response to our posting back in October 2006 on Fair Use and the misinterpretation of that doctrine at the <em>North Country Gazette</em>.  See my reaction at that time in <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2006/10/26/its-back-maxam-again-claims-fair-use-is-not-applicable/#comment-151">this Comment</a>.]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProSeThoughts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>ProSeThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>By the way, you can kill the green theme if you don&#039;t mind.  It&#039;s painful on the eyes against the white.  You asked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, you can kill the green theme if you don&#8217;t mind.  It&#8217;s painful on the eyes against the white.  You asked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProSeThoughts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>ProSeThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/2007/05/28/grand-re-opening/#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>Yay! Now I don&#039;t have to remove my link about this site.  I was hoping it would be a good a resource for pro se litigants.  Now if there can just be a pool of lawyers out there that will volunteer to help us and not tell us that dreaded &quot;I can&#039;t give you legal advice&quot; line. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Now I don&#8217;t have to remove my link about this site.  I was hoping it would be a good a resource for pro se litigants.  Now if there can just be a pool of lawyers out there that will volunteer to help us and not tell us that dreaded &#8220;I can&#8217;t give you legal advice&#8221; line. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
