<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: getting self-help help</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/getting-self-help-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep</link>
	<description>news, views and info on self-help law and pro se litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:11:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; legal info vs. legal advice in arizona courts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/getting-self-help-help/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; legal info vs. legal advice in arizona courts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/getting-self-help-help/#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>[...] Both answers seem strangely incomplete in a Handbook specifically created to help the unrepresented litigant in Arizona.  As we have said on our Getting Self-Help Help page, Arizona has been a trailblazer in creating online and in-court Self Help Centers, and the State has a network of Self-Help Centers, located in courthouses in at least a dozen counties.  A pro se litigant who complains he or she cannot afford a lawyer or who asks whether a lawyer is needed, ought to &#8212; in addition to being told about attorney options &#8212; be pointed to the Self-Help Center down the hall (or across the room), which surely has relevant information and assistance.  To respond by only suggesting they seek out a list of lawyers or the Bar Association&#8217;s referral program is inexplicable (unless, of course, the Arizona Bar controlled the Task Force).   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Both answers seem strangely incomplete in a Handbook specifically created to help the unrepresented litigant in Arizona.  As we have said on our Getting Self-Help Help page, Arizona has been a trailblazer in creating online and in-court Self Help Centers, and the State has a network of Self-Help Centers, located in courthouses in at least a dozen counties.  A pro se litigant who complains he or she cannot afford a lawyer or who asks whether a lawyer is needed, ought to &#8212; in addition to being told about attorney options &#8212; be pointed to the Self-Help Center down the hall (or across the room), which surely has relevant information and assistance.  To respond by only suggesting they seek out a list of lawyers or the Bar Association&#8217;s referral program is inexplicable (unless, of course, the Arizona Bar controlled the Task Force).   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the Florida Bar and you the people</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/getting-self-help-help/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the Florida Bar and you the people</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/shlep/getting-self-help-help/#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>[...] Even bar groups deserve the benefit of the doubt, however.  So, I thought I&#8217;d follow up on Mr. Lamb&#8217;s apparent endorsement of pro se litigants using the legal documents that are available at &#8220;courthouses or through the Florida Bar for free.&#8221;   I was especially optimistic, because (as we noted in &#8220;getting self-help help&#8220;), the Florida State Courts have a nice little Self-Help Program, that focuses on Family Court matters (e.g., divorce, custody, child support, paternity) &#8212; with many forms created with the pro se litigant in mind, and  a network of local self-help centers that provide a variety of onsite services.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even bar groups deserve the benefit of the doubt, however.  So, I thought I&#8217;d follow up on Mr. Lamb&#8217;s apparent endorsement of pro se litigants using the legal documents that are available at &#8220;courthouses or through the Florida Bar for free.&#8221;   I was especially optimistic, because (as we noted in &#8220;getting self-help help&#8220;), the Florida State Courts have a nice little Self-Help Program, that focuses on Family Court matters (e.g., divorce, custody, child support, paternity) &#8212; with many forms created with the pro se litigant in mind, and  a network of local self-help centers that provide a variety of onsite services.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
