<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adorkable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/</link>
	<description>Snarl\'s Humble Webpage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:37:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3440&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Sorry Karl the Adorkable fits.
Now who&#039;s this Mike guy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3440'></a></p>
<p>Sorry Karl the Adorkable fits.<br />
Now who&#8217;s this Mike guy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atari_age</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>atari_age</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 02:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3436&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Adorkable, huh?  OK, if you guys have a real cool vibe, then that actually can sound cute.  I don&#039;t know if it&#039;d make me hot for him, but that probably wasn&#039;t the point. Also depends how secure you are being a dork ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3436'></a></p>
<p>Adorkable, huh?  OK, if you guys have a real cool vibe, then that actually can sound cute.  I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;d make me hot for him, but that probably wasn&#8217;t the point. Also depends how secure you are being a dork <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3435&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

yeah, adokable. and this mike guy sounds great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3435'></a></p>
<p>yeah, adokable. and this mike guy sounds great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3434&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Yes, dates used to be like that, parents peeking through the curtains to make sure &quot;nothing&quot; happened and everything.  No, you may not ask me how I know.

I wrote Mark of Zeitzeuge a while ago when he referred to Brian as the guy he was &quot;dating.&quot;  I pointed out that they&#039;d been living together for a year, were totally committed and having sex as often as possible.  He agreed that enormous social changes had pretty much blown the traditional concept of dating right out of the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3434'></a></p>
<p>Yes, dates used to be like that, parents peeking through the curtains to make sure &#8220;nothing&#8221; happened and everything.  No, you may not ask me how I know.</p>
<p>I wrote Mark of Zeitzeuge a while ago when he referred to Brian as the guy he was &#8220;dating.&#8221;  I pointed out that they&#8217;d been living together for a year, were totally committed and having sex as often as possible.  He agreed that enormous social changes had pretty much blown the traditional concept of dating right out of the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3433&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

When I was single, I used to say that I hated dating. It turned out that I only hated dating the wrong people. When my partner and I started dating four years ago, I used to look forward to the sappy things like the goodnight kiss, the cards and little presents. Dating was a way for us to get to know each other on a more intimate level than just having sex could. Also, it signified that our relationship was special, since dating requires a bit of a commitment, but it&#039;s not as if felt the need to get engaged in six months or anything. We still set aside &quot;date nights&quot;, nights that belong just to us to go have dinner out or to relax at home. It sounds like Mike is a great guy. If you&#039;re enjoying your time with him, don&#039;t question it, just consider yourself lucky and keep seeing him. At least, that&#039;s my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3433'></a></p>
<p>When I was single, I used to say that I hated dating. It turned out that I only hated dating the wrong people. When my partner and I started dating four years ago, I used to look forward to the sappy things like the goodnight kiss, the cards and little presents. Dating was a way for us to get to know each other on a more intimate level than just having sex could. Also, it signified that our relationship was special, since dating requires a bit of a commitment, but it&#8217;s not as if felt the need to get engaged in six months or anything. We still set aside &#8220;date nights&#8221;, nights that belong just to us to go have dinner out or to relax at home. It sounds like Mike is a great guy. If you&#8217;re enjoying your time with him, don&#8217;t question it, just consider yourself lucky and keep seeing him. At least, that&#8217;s my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karyn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>karyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3432&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Hem hem... me think he doth protest too late.

Fugly would&#039;ve been worse, that&#039;s for damn certain, but I&#039;d not embrace Adorkable either! I&#039;d come up with a word of my own if I were you...

And he should be careful with focus.  I&#039;ve heard that used pretty rogueishly.  

Yes those dates did happen.  My first date with my to-be-husband involved the picking up, the dinner, the chatting, the dropping at the door - not a kiss even!  They were widely broadcast via the media mostly ( I think ) to portray to young people how they were expected to behave on a date.  Yeah.  I&#039;m so sure that worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3432'></a></p>
<p>Hem hem&#8230; me think he doth protest too late.</p>
<p>Fugly would&#8217;ve been worse, that&#8217;s for damn certain, but I&#8217;d not embrace Adorkable either! I&#8217;d come up with a word of my own if I were you&#8230;</p>
<p>And he should be careful with focus.  I&#8217;ve heard that used pretty rogueishly.  </p>
<p>Yes those dates did happen.  My first date with my to-be-husband involved the picking up, the dinner, the chatting, the dropping at the door &#8211; not a kiss even!  They were widely broadcast via the media mostly ( I think ) to portray to young people how they were expected to behave on a date.  Yeah.  I&#8217;m so sure that worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lise</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Lise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3431&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

First of all, thank god! Otherwise I would have unpleasant images now while cooking. Secondly, I think it&#039;s sweet you were called adorkable. Thirdly, here&#039;s my word of the day: usufruct (yoo&#039; zoo fruckt). &quot;Enjoying all the advantages derivable from the use of something which belongs to another.&quot; Added advantage is when you sling it at someone (you damn usufructer)it sounds like you&#039;re hurling an epithet at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3431'></a></p>
<p>First of all, thank god! Otherwise I would have unpleasant images now while cooking. Secondly, I think it&#8217;s sweet you were called adorkable. Thirdly, here&#8217;s my word of the day: usufruct (yoo&#8217; zoo fruckt). &#8220;Enjoying all the advantages derivable from the use of something which belongs to another.&#8221; Added advantage is when you sling it at someone (you damn usufructer)it sounds like you&#8217;re hurling an epithet at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3430&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Yeah...right....LMAO....good attempt to cover Karl....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3430'></a></p>
<p>Yeah&#8230;right&#8230;.LMAO&#8230;.good attempt to cover Karl&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/snarl/2005/11/16/adorkable/#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>&lt;a name=&#039;a3429&#039;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

OK - before any of you come to any conclusions, let me state here that anal beads and Crisco were NOT incorporated into any of our dates.


...yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a3429'></a></p>
<p>OK &#8211; before any of you come to any conclusions, let me state here that anal beads and Crisco were NOT incorporated into any of our dates.</p>
<p>&#8230;yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
