<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>Stop Torture</title>
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture</link>
	<description>The Harvard Anti-Torture Coalition</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Former DoJ lawyer refuses to rule out burying people alive</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/28/former-doj-lawyer-refuses-to-rule-out-burying-people-alive/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/28/former-doj-lawyer-refuses-to-rule-out-burying-people-alive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/28/former-doj-lawyer-refuses-to-rule-out-burying-people-alive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When asked at a recent Congressional hearing, John Yoo&#8211;chief legal architect of the Bush torture policy and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the Department of Justice&#8217;s Office of Legal Counsel&#8211;refused declare that burying prisoners alive would be illegal for the president to order.  Watch here.
As noted previously here and here, in prior Congressional hearings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When asked at a recent Congressional hearing, John Yoo&#8211;chief legal architect of the Bush torture policy and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the Department of Justice&#8217;s Office of Legal Counsel&#8211;refused declare that burying prisoners alive would be illegal for the president to order.  Watch <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4B5BNeWNShs" title="Yoo -- burying people alive might be ok">here</a>.</p>
<p>As noted previously <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/07/attorney-general-refuses-to-rule-out-beating-of-detainees/">here </a>and <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2007/10/24/democrats-on-the-senate-judiciary-follow-up-with-mukasey-on-waterbo/">here</a>, in prior Congressional hearings in 2007 and 2008, current attorney general Michael Mukasey refused to say whether he thought waterboarding, beatings, electric shocks, or the use of the rack and screw could be authorized by the president.  Watch those videos <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/07/attorney-general-refuses-to-rule-out-beating-of-detainees/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt8v_GAgOK4">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/28/former-doj-lawyer-refuses-to-rule-out-burying-people-alive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court says &#8220;prompt&#8221; habeas hearings are Guantánamo detainees&#8217; right</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/13/supreme-court-orders-prompt-habeas-hearings-for-guantanamo-detainee/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/13/supreme-court-orders-prompt-habeas-hearings-for-guantanamo-detainee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/13/supreme-court-orders-prompt-habea</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good:  Boumediene ruling (Supreme Court says &#8220;prompt&#8221; habeas hearings are Guantánamo detainees&#8217; right. They have a right to habeas corpus.  Really this time.  No, really.  No, no, really.  At least until the administration attempts another convenient work around.).
The bad:  Munaf ruling (Meanwhile, on the same day, the Supreme [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><u>The good</u>:<strong> </strong> <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/06-1195.pdf">Boumediene ruling</a> (Supreme Court says &#8220;prompt&#8221; habeas hearings are Guantánamo detainees&#8217; right. They have a right to habeas corpus.  Really this time.  No, really.  No, no, really.  At least until the administration attempts another convenient work around.).</p>
<p><u>The bad</u>:<strong>  </strong><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/06-1666.pdf">Munaf ruling</a> (Meanwhile, on the same day, the Supreme Court failed to adequately protect two U.S. citizens from transfer to Iraqi custody, under which they say they will be tortured).</p>
<p><u>The ugly</u>:<strong> </strong> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/us/politics/13candidates.html">John McCain</a> categorically calls all Guantánamo detainees &#8220;unlawful combatants&#8221; even though their right to have a real judge determine whether such labels apply is what all the fuss in the Supreme Court has been about.  McCain also suggested that because the Guantánamo detainees are foreigners, they do not deserve the right to try to prove to a judge why they should not be imprisoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/06/13/supreme-court-orders-prompt-habeas-hearings-for-guantanamo-detainee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Years Later, Still No Justice for Abu Ghraib</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/28/four-years-later-still-no-justice-for-abu-ghraib/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/28/four-years-later-still-no-justice-for-abu-ghraib/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/28/four-years-later-still-no-justice</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks four years since the public release of the Abu Ghraib photos.   New photos keep emering, and despite a mountain of evidence, not one major leader in the chain of command has been brought to justice for torture.
&#160;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today marks four years since the public <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/27/60II/main614063.shtml">release</a> of the Abu Ghraib <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/05/03/slideshow_040503">photos</a>.   <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/multimedia/2008/02/gallery_abu_ghraib">New photos</a> keep emering, and despite a <a href="http://www.hrw.org/photos/2005/torture/">mountain</a> of <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/LawPolitics/Story?id=4635175">evidence</a>, not one major leader in the <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/05/24/040524fa_fact">chain of command</a> has been brought to justice for torture.</p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/files/2008/04/postertorture.jpg" height="1220" width="947" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/28/four-years-later-still-no-justice-for-abu-ghraib/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Allows Prisoners to Die Painfully</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/16/supreme-court-allows-prisoners-to-die-painfully/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/16/supreme-court-allows-prisoners-to-die-painfully/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/16/supreme-court-allows-prisoners-to</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court chose to OK lethal injections again.  In reaction, Kentucky, Montana, Texas, Oklahoma, Virginia, and Florida got excited about killing people again.
Meanwhile, Bush tells the Pope that Americans &#8220;need your message that all life is sacred.&#8221;
From Justice Stevens&#8217;s concurring opinion in the case (citations omitted): &#8220;Because it masks any outward sign of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/washington/17scotus.html?hp" title="NYTimes article"><img src="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/files/2008/04/all-of-life-is-sacred.jpg" alt="All life is sacred!" align="left" height="545" width="609" /></a>The Supreme Court chose to OK lethal injections again.  In reaction, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gjxFBni-7RXkXhAt6AlDHW6rgXqwD90391100">Kentucky</a>, <a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gn5BuKTdaJiTUzzl3mhE6YlsKXQA">Montana</a>, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gjxFBni-7RXkXhAt6AlDHW6rgXqwD90391100">Texas</a>, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gjxFBni-7RXkXhAt6AlDHW6rgXqwD90391100">Oklahoma</a>, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gjxFBni-7RXkXhAt6AlDHW6rgXqwD90391100">Virginia</a>, and <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gjxFBni-7RXkXhAt6AlDHW6rgXqwD90391100">Florida</a> got excited about killing people again.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Bush tells the Pope that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/us/nationalspecial2/17pope.html?hp">Americans &#8220;need your message that all life is sacred.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>From Justice Stevens&#8217;s <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=07-5439&amp;friend=nytimes">concurring opinion</a> in the case (citations omitted): <em>&#8220;Because it masks any outward sign of distress, pancuronium bromide creates a risk that the inmate will suffer excruciating pain before death occurs. There is a general understanding among veterinarians that the risk of pain is sufficiently serious that the use of the drug should be proscribed when an animal&#8217;s life is being terminated.<sup><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=07-5439&amp;friend=nytimes#FNconcurrence2.1" name="FRconcurrence2.1"></a></sup> As a result of this understanding among knowledgeable professionals, several States&#8211;including Kentucky&#8211;have enacted legislation prohibiting use of the drug in animal euthanasia. It is unseemly&#8211;to say the least&#8211;that Kentucky may well kill petitioners using a drug that it would not permit to be used on their pets.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/16/supreme-court-allows-prisoners-to-die-painfully/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Admits Condoning Torture</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/13/bush-admits-condoning-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/13/bush-admits-condoning-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/13/bush-admits-condoning-torture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC News reports that Bush knew that Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell, and Tenet met and authorized the use of specific torture techniques on particular prisoners.  This astounding admission has gotten little attention in the media so far, which is remarkable given it is seemingly conclusive evidence of Bush&#8217;s liability for torture and war crimes, all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC News <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/LawPolitics/story?id=4635175&amp;page=1" title="ABC News Reports Bush Approved Water Torture">reports</a> that Bush knew that Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell, and Tenet met and authorized the use of specific torture techniques on particular prisoners.  This astounding admission has gotten little attention in the media so far, which is remarkable given it is seemingly conclusive evidence of Bush&#8217;s liability for torture and war crimes, all impeachable offenses.</p>
<p><u>Highlights from ABC News</u>:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;Well, we started to connect the dots in order to protect the American people.&#8221; Bush told ABC News White House correspondent Martha Raddatz. &#8220;And yes, I&#8217;m aware our national security team met on this issue. And I approved.&#8221;</p>
<p>As first reported by ABC News Wednesday, the most senior Bush administration officials repeatedly discussed and approved specific details of exactly how high-value al Qaeda suspects would be interrogated by the CIA.</p>
<p>The high-level discussions about these &#8220;enhanced interrogation techniques&#8221; were so detailed, these sources said, some of the interrogation sessions were almost choreographed &#8212; down to the number of times CIA agents could use a specific tactic.</p>
<p>These top advisers signed off on how the CIA would interrogate top al Qaeda suspects &#8212; whether they would be slapped, pushed, deprived of sleep or subjected to simulated drowning, called waterboarding, sources told ABC news.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/13/bush-admits-condoning-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Cheney et al. directly authorized torture</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/10/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-cheney-et-al-directly-authorized-tortu/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/10/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-cheney-et-al-directly-authorized-tortu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/10/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-chen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC News reports that the &#8220;Principals Committee,&#8221; consisting of Dick Cheney, Condelezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, George Tenet, and Colin Powell, met in the White House routinely to directly authorize torture techniques to be used on specific detainees, including combinations involving water torture (waterboarding), sleep deprivation, and other methods.  This opens them all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC News <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/LawPolitics/Story?id=4583256&amp;page=4" title="Cheney et al directly authorized torture">reports</a> that the &#8220;Principals Committee,&#8221; consisting of Dick <strong>Cheney</strong>, Condelezza <strong>Rice</strong>, Donald <strong>Rumsfeld</strong>, John <strong>Ashcroft</strong>, George <strong>Tenet</strong>, and Colin <strong>Powell</strong>, met in the White House routinely to <strong>directly authorize torture</strong> techniques to be used on specific detainees, including combinations involving <strong>water torture (waterboarding)</strong>, sleep deprivation, and other methods.  <strong>This opens them all up for criminal liability under the War Crimes Act and the federal torture statute.</strong></p>
<p>Mr. Bush, where is your signature on all of this?  I suppose we will only see that later.  Impeachment anyone?</p>
<p><u>Highlights from the report</u>:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;According to multiple sources, it was <strong>members of the Principals Committee that not only discussed specific plans and specific interrogation methods, but </strong><strong><u>approved them</u>.&#8221;</strong></li>
<li>The Jay Bybee Torture Memo (Aug. 2002) was referred to as the  <strong>&#8220;</strong><u><strong>Golden Shield</strong></u><strong>&#8220;</strong> in the CIA.</li>
<li>Ashcroft (who apparently agreed with the policy and thought it legal) did not, however, want to get into the dirty details and said : <strong>&#8220;</strong><u><strong>Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not judge this kindly.</strong></u><strong>&#8220;</strong></li>
<li>Rice (who led the advisor&#8217;s group and was reportedly &#8220;decisive&#8221; on this) pushed the CIA to go torture:<strong>&#8220;<u>This is your baby. Go do it.</u>&#8220;</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>And, just for the record, because we think this will be important one day:</p>
<p>Rice&#8217;s top legal advisor at the time was none other than our illustrious alum, John B. Bellinger III HLS &#8216;86. This is the same guy who followed her to the White House when she became Sec. of State. This is the same guy who wants us to think of him as a knight for human rights in the wilderness of this administration.</p>
<p>The time has come for accountability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/04/10/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-cheney-et-al-directly-authorized-tortu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>URGENT: Call on Congress to Override the Bush Veto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/03/10/call-on-congress-to-override-the-bush-veto/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/03/10/call-on-congress-to-override-the-bush-veto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/03/10/call-on-congress-to-override-the-</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

An urgent appeal from the National Religious Campaign Against Torture:



TORTURE IS A MORAL ISSUE



&#160;


Dear Friends:
On Saturday, March 8, President Bush vetoed H.R. 2082, an important piece of anti-torture legislation that would have banned the use of waterboarding, stress positions, induced hypothermia, and other so-called &#8220;harsh&#8221; interrogation techniques by requiring all U.S. intelligence agencies, including the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td><em><strong>An urgent appeal from the National Religious Campaign Against Torture:</strong></em><img src="http://nrcat.nonprofitsoapbox.com/storage/nrcat/images/nrcat_logo.jpg" height="141" width="620" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ff0000">
<p align="center">TORTURE IS A MORAL ISSUE</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><span>Dear Friends:</span></p>
<p><span>On Saturday, March 8, President Bush vetoed H.R. 2082, an important piece of anti-torture legislation that would have banned the use of waterboarding, stress positions, induced hypothermia, and other so-called &#8220;harsh&#8221; interrogation techniques by requiring all U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, to abide by the restrictions in the Army Field Manual while conducting interrogations.<span>  </span>H.R. 2082 was passed by a majority of both houses of Congress.</span></p>
<p><span>Sometime this week, possibly as soon as tomorrow, the U.S. House will vote on whether or not to override the President&#8217;s veto.<span>  </span>It is very difficult to override a veto (it requires a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress), so the attempt to override may not be successful. That said, we want to make every effort to convince as many Members of Congress as possible to vote for the override.</span></p>
<p><span>Please call your Representative in Congress and urge him or her to vote to override the President&#8217;s veto of H.R. 2082, the Intelligence Authorization bill. To contact your Member of Congress you can call the Capitol switchboard at <span><span>(202)224-3121 and ask to speak with your Representative.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Thank you for your efforts to end U.S.-sponsored torture.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Sincerely,</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Linda Gustitus, President, NRCAT<br />
Richard Killmer, Executive Director, NRCAT</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/03/10/call-on-congress-to-override-the-bush-veto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>URGENT: Tell the White House to Sign the Anti-Torture Bill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/15/urgent-tell-the-white-house-to-sign-the-anti-torture-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/15/urgent-tell-the-white-house-to-sign-the-anti-torture-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/15/urgent-tell-the-white-house-to-si</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***Call the White House at 202-456-1111, or email the President at  comments@whitehouse.gov to express your support for H.R. 2082 (the Intelligence Authorization bill).*** 
&#160;
***The law (H.R. 2082) would prohibit the CIA from using techniques not authorized in the Army Field Manual, which also specifically bans many torture techniques, including waterboarding, stress positions, use of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong>***<u>Call the White House at 202-456-1111, or email the President at  <a href="mailto:comments@whitehouse.gov" target="_blank">comments@whitehouse.gov</a> to express your support for H.R. 2082 (the Intelligence Authorization bill).</u>*** </strong></p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center"><strong>***The law (H.R. 2082) would prohibit the CIA from using techniques not authorized in the Army Field Manual, which also specifically bans many torture techniques, including waterboarding, stress positions, use of dogs, and others.***</strong></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><em>A message from the National Religious Campaign Against Torture:</em></p>
<p align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td><a href="www.tortureisamoralissue.org"><img src="http://nrcat.nonprofitsoapbox.com/storage/nrcat/images/nrcat_logo.jpg" height="141" width="620" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ff0000">
<p align="center">TORTURE IS A MORAL ISSUE</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">To Supporters of the National Religious Campaign Against TortureDear Friends:</p>
<p>We have good news.  Earlier this week, on a 51-46 vote, the Senate passed important anti-torture legislation that would prohibit all U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, from engaging in torture or other so-called &#8220;harsh&#8221; interrogation techniques.  This bill has already passed the House of Representatives and now it only needs the President&#8217;s signature to become law.</p>
<p>This is an enormous victory, and it is in part due to your efforts and the efforts of NRCAT.  By emailing and calling your Senators, you made it clear to them that the American people expect Congress to take a clear stand against torture.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, however, the President has already said that he plans to veto the bill rather than sign it into law.  If he does so, he will repudiate the will of both houses of Congress and of the American people.  Worse, he will keep us an immoral and destructive path.</p>
<p>We ask you to call the White House at 202-456-1111, or to email the President at  <a href="mailto:comments@whitehouse.gov" target="_blank">comments@whitehouse.gov</a> to express your support for H.R. 2082 (the Intelligence Authorization bill).  Tell the President that we cannot win the war on terror by abandoning the values that made us great, and that he can help return us to those values by signing H.R. 2082.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Linda Gustitus, President, NRCAT<br />
Richard Killmer, Executive Director, NRCAT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><em>You have received this message because you endorsed the &#8220;Torture is a Moral Issue&#8221; statement of the National Religious Campaign Against Torture OR you signed up to receive more information from NRCAT.</em></p>
<p>If you no longer wish to receive emails from us, <a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=8oGdq5PE8TiY7JWb938GRFVcasez3VLC" target="_blank">please click here</a> to unsubscribe from this mailing list.</p>
<p>Questions? Please email <a href="mailto:campaign@nrcat.org" target="_blank">campaign@nrcat.org</a><br />
<font color="#888888">   National Religious Campaign Against Torture: <a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=0eTSEMxr4omNDwRUxkpH9xhjc4tae2H5" target="_blank">www.tortureisamoralissue.org</a> - <em>New Web Address</em></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/15/urgent-tell-the-white-house-to-sign-the-anti-torture-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>URGENT advocacy initiative from the National Religious Campaign Against Torture</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/urgent-advocacy-initiative-from-the-national-religious-campaign-aga/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/urgent-advocacy-initiative-from-the-national-religious-campaign-aga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/urgent-advocacy-initiative-from-t</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

A message from the National Religious Campaign against Torture:



TORTURE IS A MORAL ISSUE



&#160;


Dear Friends:
An important vote is going to take place tomorrow, Wednesday, February 13.
The Senate will decide whether we stop the CIA&#8217;s use of &#8220;enhanced interrogation techniques&#8221; &#8212; or as we would call them, torture.  Section 327 of the Intelligence Authorization Conference Report [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td><em>A message from the National Religious Campaign against Torture:</em><a href="http://www.nrcat.org/"><img src="http://nrcat.nonprofitsoapbox.com/storage/nrcat/images/nrcat_logo.jpg" height="141" width="620" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ff0000">
<p align="center">TORTURE IS A MORAL ISSUE</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Dear Friends:</p>
<p>An important vote is going to take place tomorrow, Wednesday, February 13.</p>
<p>The Senate will decide whether we stop the CIA&#8217;s use of &#8220;enhanced interrogation techniques&#8221; &#8212; or as we would call them, torture.  Section 327 of the Intelligence Authorization Conference Report (H.R. 2082), would prohibit the CIA from using abusive interrogation techniques (such as waterboarding) by requiring the CIA to comply with the Army Field Manual while conducting interrogations.  The Army Field Manual prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.</p>
<p>Please call your Senators now &#8212; and urge them to support Section 327 of the Intelligence Authorization conference report.  Call the Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121 and ask to be connected to your Senators&#8217; offices.  You can also go to the NRCAT website (<a href="http://www.tortureisamoralissue.org/" target="_blank">www.tortureisamoralissue.org</a>) and click on the link in the upper right red box.  It will take you to a page that makes it easy to email your Senators.</p>
<p>This is the most important anti-torture legislation now before Congress with a real chance of passage.  (The House has already passed this bill.)  Every phone call counts.</p>
<p>Thank you for all that you do to end U.S.-sponsored torture.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Linda Gustitus, NRCAT President<br />
Richard Killmer, Executive Director</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/urgent-advocacy-initiative-from-the-national-religious-campaign-aga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Justice Scalia Comes Out in Favor of Torture</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/us-supreme-court-justice-scalia-comes-out-in-favor-of-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/us-supreme-court-justice-scalia-comes-out-in-favor-of-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stoptorture</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/us-supreme-court-justice-scalia-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Antonin Scalia gave a radio interview in Britain in which he suggested that &#8220;smacking someone in the face&#8221; should be legally justified in certain cases.  Justice Scalia posed a hypothetical in which he claimed not allowing &#8220;so-called torture&#8221; would be &#8220;absurd.&#8221;
 
See the BBC report on the interview here.  Check out a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Justice Antonin Scalia gave a radio interview in Britain in which he suggested that &#8220;smacking someone in the face&#8221; should be legally justified in certain cases.  Justice Scalia posed a hypothetical in which he claimed not allowing &#8220;so-called torture&#8221; would be &#8220;absurd.&#8221;</p>
<p><font size="2"> </font></p>
<p>See the BBC report on the interview <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7239748.stm">here</a>.  Check out a trascript on IntLawGrrls <a href="http://intlawgrrls.blogspot.com/2008/02/justice-scalia-on-so-called-torture.html">here</a>. The full audio is available <a href="http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/radio4/law/law_20080212-1704.mp3">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/stoptorture/2008/02/12/us-supreme-court-justice-scalia-comes-out-in-favor-of-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
