<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palfrey on Cyberlaw &amp; Digital Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ugasser/2004/10/06/palfrey-on-cyberlaw-digital-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ugasser/2004/10/06/palfrey-on-cyberlaw-digital-media/</link>
	<description>obtaining a better understanding of the information society and law’s role in it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:35:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paul reads ...</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ugasser/2004/10/06/palfrey-on-cyberlaw-digital-media/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>paul reads ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ugasser/2004/10/06/palfrey-on-cyberlaw-digital-media/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;4,931 Words Later: The iTunes Agreement (and incorporations by reference)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Aside from its length of 4,941 words, another problem is how often I am asked to assent to its terms — at every software update and periodically in between. This is of course redundant if their future terms clause, in which you &quot;agree to agree&quot;, ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>4,931 Words Later: The iTunes Agreement (and incorporations by reference)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Aside from its length of 4,941 words, another problem is how often I am asked to assent to its terms — at every software update and periodically in between. This is of course redundant if their future terms clause, in which you &#8220;agree to agree&#8221;, ha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
