<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Customer Deflection Mismanagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/</link>
	<description>Developing tools for customer independence and engagement with vendors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:08:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Closer to home</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/comment-page-1/#comment-4053</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Closer to home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/#comment-4053</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; Washington Mutual &#8212; was a bozo bank. What can you say about a bank that never got its online banking to work right? Plenty, but it&#8217;s too late to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; Washington Mutual &#8212; was a bozo bank. What can you say about a bank that never got its online banking to work right? Plenty, but it&#8217;s too late to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/comment-page-1/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how many times I have called my internet company because my internet was down - and have the call center refer me to the website.  What?!  I think as companies continue to cut costs - we will run into this more and more.  I watched an &lt;a href=&quot;http://mshare.net/news/mshare-news-04102008.html&quot; title=&quot;interview&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt; that talked alot about this.  Pretty interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how many times I have called my internet company because my internet was down &#8211; and have the call center refer me to the website.  What?!  I think as companies continue to cut costs &#8211; we will run into this more and more.  I watched an <a href="http://mshare.net/news/mshare-news-04102008.html" title="interview" rel="nofollow">interview</a> that talked alot about this.  Pretty interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Landsman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Landsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your Opinion Counts&quot; is the standard message in user-based and user held ratings and data collectionware.

By telling them (the respondents) that their opinion counts, the company providing the research tool almost always increases response rate by a very significant percent.

Telling the respondents that their input counts elevates them to a status in which they are incumbent, &quot;the people who count&quot; ergo, the upper crust.  

The data supporting this is very strong -- also the data supporting the exact wording.

If you&#039;ve ever filled out a questionnaire or survey form from a major research organization the odds are pretty high that they&#039;ve told you that YOUR OPINION COUNTS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Your Opinion Counts&#8221; is the standard message in user-based and user held ratings and data collectionware.</p>
<p>By telling them (the respondents) that their opinion counts, the company providing the research tool almost always increases response rate by a very significant percent.</p>
<p>Telling the respondents that their input counts elevates them to a status in which they are incumbent, &#8220;the people who count&#8221; ergo, the upper crust.  </p>
<p>The data supporting this is very strong &#8212; also the data supporting the exact wording.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve ever filled out a questionnaire or survey form from a major research organization the odds are pretty high that they&#8217;ve told you that YOUR OPINION COUNTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Henderson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yes, my bank (First Direct) in UK did a security upgrade last week and managed to forget about their 21,000 safari users - so no online banking for me for a bit without all the hassle of installing a new browser and going back through the security process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, my bank (First Direct) in UK did a security upgrade last week and managed to forget about their 21,000 safari users &#8211; so no online banking for me for a bit without all the hassle of installing a new browser and going back through the security process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Customer Deflection Mismanagement &#171; The Bankwatch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Customer Deflection Mismanagement &#171; The Bankwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2007/03/16/customer-deflection-mismanagement/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: ProjectVRM Blog » Customer Deflection Mismanagement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: ProjectVRM Blog » Customer Deflection Mismanagement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
