<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VRM is user-driven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/</link>
	<description>Developing tools for customer independence and engagement with vendors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:55:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Care to spend your holiday weekend policing directory listings? &#124; SEO Backlinking - SEO and Online Reputation Management Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-8607</link>
		<dc:creator>Care to spend your holiday weekend policing directory listings? &#124; SEO Backlinking - SEO and Online Reputation Management Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-8607</guid>
		<description>[...] you, hoping you&#8217;ll eventually claim and/or correct it. This tactic, neither user-centric nor user-driven, is insidious for at least three [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you, hoping you&#8217;ll eventually claim and/or correct it. This tactic, neither user-centric nor user-driven, is insidious for at least three [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Care to spend your holiday weekend policing directory listings? &#124; SEO Backlinking -Marketing - Online Reputation Management - Pay Per Click - SEO Consultancy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-5337</link>
		<dc:creator>Care to spend your holiday weekend policing directory listings? &#124; SEO Backlinking -Marketing - Online Reputation Management - Pay Per Click - SEO Consultancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-5337</guid>
		<description>[...] you, hoping you&#8217;ll eventually claim and/or correct it. This tactic, neither user-centric nor user-driven, is insidious for at least three [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you, hoping you&#8217;ll eventually claim and/or correct it. This tactic, neither user-centric nor user-driven, is insidious for at least three [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Identity Workout</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-4379</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity Workout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-4379</guid>
		<description>[...] focus has been on what we call &#8220;user-centric&#8221; identity, but I prefer the term user-driven, especially as it relates to VRM. So much has come out of IIWs over the years, or has been improved [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] focus has been on what we call &#8220;user-centric&#8221; identity, but I prefer the term user-driven, especially as it relates to VRM. So much has come out of IIWs over the years, or has been improved [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Identity Workout</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-4363</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Identity Workout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-4363</guid>
		<description>[...] focus has been on what we call &#8220;user-centric&#8221; identity, but I prefer the term user-driven, especially as it relates to VRM. So much has come out of IIWs over the years, or has been improved [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] focus has been on what we call &#8220;user-centric&#8221; identity, but I prefer the term user-driven, especially as it relates to VRM. So much has come out of IIWs over the years, or has been improved [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Ellis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-4179</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-4179</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a first time reader and hope this p-o-v isn&#039;t already obvious to everyone in the VRM community, but I think the nomenclature matter could be un-packed and better explained if you embraced the &quot;ideological&quot; dimension of your position.  

Microsoft Identity Architect Kim Cameron writes in the &quot;Laws of Identity&quot; that whether a law &quot;meshes with values is not the relevant issue.&quot;  Okay, that&#039;s where Info Card is at.  

In contrast you anchor VRM in the &quot;sovereign autonomy and independence of each individual as a fully-empowered participant....&quot;  

Echoes of Locke and Bentham are fine with me.  I see no downsides in having values -- as long as they&#039;re explicit -- inform tech development and business practices, and you&#039;ve certainly been explicit. 

Here&#039;s to plain speaking!  Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a first time reader and hope this p-o-v isn&#8217;t already obvious to everyone in the VRM community, but I think the nomenclature matter could be un-packed and better explained if you embraced the &#8220;ideological&#8221; dimension of your position.  </p>
<p>Microsoft Identity Architect Kim Cameron writes in the &#8220;Laws of Identity&#8221; that whether a law &#8220;meshes with values is not the relevant issue.&#8221;  Okay, that&#8217;s where Info Card is at.  </p>
<p>In contrast you anchor VRM in the &#8220;sovereign autonomy and independence of each individual as a fully-empowered participant&#8230;.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Echoes of Locke and Bentham are fine with me.  I see no downsides in having values &#8212; as long as they&#8217;re explicit &#8212; inform tech development and business practices, and you&#8217;ve certainly been explicit. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to plain speaking!  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pushing String &#187; Venn and the art of data-sharing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-4000</link>
		<dc:creator>Pushing String &#187; Venn and the art of data-sharing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-4000</guid>
		<description>[...] personal information, for example by issuing a personal RFP to potential vendors. As Doc Searls has said, VRM is &#8220;personal first and social second&#8221;, so it seems to have a closer kinship with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] personal information, for example by issuing a personal RFP to potential vendors. As Doc Searls has said, VRM is &#8220;personal first and social second&#8221;, so it seems to have a closer kinship with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Two posts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-3978</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls Weblog &#183; Two posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-3978</guid>
		<description>[...] In Linux Journal, Is government open source code we can patch? And in the ProjectVRM blog, VRM is user-driven. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Linux Journal, Is government open source code we can patch? And in the ProjectVRM blog, VRM is user-driven. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeandrieu.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Towards User-Driven Search</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>joeandrieu.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Towards User-Driven Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>[...] your own ingredients and making the tuna salad yourself. When I first talked with Doc about user-driven instead of user-centric, Jim Carrey’s The Truman Show immediately sprang to mind: from birth, Truman is the protagonist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your own ingredients and making the tuna salad yourself. When I first talked with Doc about user-driven instead of user-centric, Jim Carrey’s The Truman Show immediately sprang to mind: from birth, Truman is the protagonist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2P Foundation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From user to producer: what&#8217;s the right conceptual framing?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-3881</link>
		<dc:creator>P2P Foundation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From user to producer: what&#8217;s the right conceptual framing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-3881</guid>
		<description>[...] Searls writes:  &#8220;In Two tales of user-centricities, Adriana Lukas gets at something that has bothered me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Searls writes:  &#8220;In Two tales of user-centricities, Adriana Lukas gets at something that has bothered me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawgarithms mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/comment-page-1/#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawgarithms mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/04/28/vrm-is-user-driven/#comment-3846</guid>
		<description>[...] in hope that you&#8217;ll eventually claim and/or correct it. This tactic, neither user-centric nor user-driven, is insidious for at least three [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in hope that you&#8217;ll eventually claim and/or correct it. This tactic, neither user-centric nor user-driven, is insidious for at least three [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
