Comments on: A nice unpacking of VRM http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/ Developing tools for customer independence and engagement with vendors Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:22:38 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: Socialutions Implementation Strategy: Taking your company from zero to hero on the social web | socialutions http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/comment-page-1/#comment-3443 Socialutions Implementation Strategy: Taking your company from zero to hero on the social web | socialutions Wed, 14 May 2008 07:08:33 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/#comment-3443 [...] seen more than a few examples of big, giant companies who give more than lip service to the process Doc Searls detailed almost five years ago (and Eve Maler recently simplified for those who love simple [...] [...] seen more than a few examples of big, giant companies who give more than lip service to the process Doc Searls detailed almost five years ago (and Eve Maler recently simplified for those who love simple [...]

]]> By: Eve M. http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/comment-page-1/#comment-3442 Eve M. Tue, 13 May 2008 21:34:20 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/#comment-3442 Doc-- Thanks for the support! Wish you were here! Regarding flags vs. feeds... My slides ended up with a description of the feed-based relationship management model, so I was focusing particularly on that; as long as we start paying attention to a "relationship forging and maintenance" function that helps individuals share their data on their terms, I'm happy to go with whatever technical solution works. (And now I get a chance to plug the final diagram, which I quite liked :-) -- check it out on slide 27 of http://www.xmlgrrl.com/publications/Maler-NZIDConf-Apr2008.pdf .) Doc– Thanks for the support! Wish you were here!

Regarding flags vs. feeds… My slides ended up with a description of the feed-based relationship management model, so I was focusing particularly on that; as long as we start paying attention to a “relationship forging and maintenance” function that helps individuals share their data on their terms, I’m happy to go with whatever technical solution works.

(And now I get a chance to plug the final diagram, which I quite liked :-) — check it out on slide 27 of http://www.xmlgrrl.com/publications/Maler-NZIDConf-Apr2008.pdf .)

]]> By: Doc Searls http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/comment-page-1/#comment-3441 Doc Searls Tue, 13 May 2008 14:10:19 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/#comment-3441 I like "flags". Especially if they are selectively visible, or visible in a way by which I control how much about my needs is revealed. I like “flags”. Especially if they are selectively visible, or visible in a way by which I control how much about my needs is revealed.

]]> By: Almar van der Krogt http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/comment-page-1/#comment-3440 Almar van der Krogt Tue, 13 May 2008 13:23:07 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2008/05/12/a-nice-unpacking-of-vrm/#comment-3440 I strongly agree with this point of view. Instead of 'feeds' I would however speak of 'flags' (also to avoid confusion with regular/non-commercial feeds). A flag saying something like "I'm in the market for 'a roundtrip to Boston'". Ideally, you would be able to set these flags on your online personal page (like Netvibes.com) or one of profile pages at a social network. I strongly agree with this point of view. Instead of ‘feeds’ I would however speak of ‘flags’ (also to avoid confusion with regular/non-commercial feeds). A flag saying something like “I’m in the market for ‘a roundtrip to Boston’”. Ideally, you would be able to set these flags on your online personal page (like Netvibes.com) or one of profile pages at a social network.

]]>