<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The value of bookshelves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/03/17/the-value-of-bookshelves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/03/17/the-value-of-bookshelves/</link>
	<description>A class blog for Harvard Law\'s \"The Web Difference\" (2008)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:41:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dweinberger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/03/17/the-value-of-bookshelves/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>dweinberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/03/17/the-value-of-bookshelves/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so. I was thinking, in my aphoristic way (it&#039;s all marketing!), that if you click on a tag, you see all the other objects tagged that way, which is like seeing all the books on a shelf clustered by topic. But digg-ing something only tells the system that you approve, not what the article is about. So, diggs don&#039;t assemble objects by their semantics. Hence, no shelf.

I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so. I was thinking, in my aphoristic way (it&#8217;s all marketing!), that if you click on a tag, you see all the other objects tagged that way, which is like seeing all the books on a shelf clustered by topic. But digg-ing something only tells the system that you approve, not what the article is about. So, diggs don&#8217;t assemble objects by their semantics. Hence, no shelf.</p>
<p>I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kparker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/03/17/the-value-of-bookshelves/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>kparker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/03/17/the-value-of-bookshelves/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Every Digg as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every Digg as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
