<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arrington, Comcast and a Chicken walk into the tweetosphere&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/04/06/arrington-comcast-and-a-chicken-walk-into-the-tweetosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/04/06/arrington-comcast-and-a-chicken-walk-into-the-tweetosphere/</link>
	<description>A class blog for Harvard Law\'s \"The Web Difference\" (2008)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:41:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cbaird</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/04/06/arrington-comcast-and-a-chicken-walk-into-the-tweetosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>cbaird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/04/06/arrington-comcast-and-a-chicken#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Will an increase in people using twitter decrease the value of capabilities such as TweetScan?  I can imagine a situation in which I was a major company and I scanned for information about myself and (because of an increase in users) all i received back was noise.  Opposed to if I conducted my search before the increase in users (searching a &quot;a relatively small but very tech-savvy userbase&quot;) I might get more useful, or at least manageable, results.  

I suppose that the searching capabilities of offerings such as TweetScan may evolve with the growing population of Twitter users and allow for more detailed searches and thus eliminate some of the noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will an increase in people using twitter decrease the value of capabilities such as TweetScan?  I can imagine a situation in which I was a major company and I scanned for information about myself and (because of an increase in users) all i received back was noise.  Opposed to if I conducted my search before the increase in users (searching a &#8220;a relatively small but very tech-savvy userbase&#8221;) I might get more useful, or at least manageable, results.  </p>
<p>I suppose that the searching capabilities of offerings such as TweetScan may evolve with the growing population of Twitter users and allow for more detailed searches and thus eliminate some of the noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skass</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/04/06/arrington-comcast-and-a-chicken-walk-into-the-tweetosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>skass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/webdifference/2008/04/06/arrington-comcast-and-a-chicken#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Completely agree with your point about twitter becoming the equivalent of old school blogging.  I think the same can be said of Facebook status updates, especially now that one can combine them with the Twitter application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with your point about twitter becoming the equivalent of old school blogging.  I think the same can be said of Facebook status updates, especially now that one can combine them with the Twitter application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
