Comments on: Some Canada – US differences: why privatisation is against the law (according to the Book, anyway) http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privatisation-is-against-the-law-acc/ I am a mongrel - O ma! A gremlin... Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:34:17 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privatisation-is-against-the-law-acc/comment-page-1/#comment-450 Anonymous Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:23:59 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privat#comment-450 <a></a> Your site is realy very interesting.

Your site is realy very interesting.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privatisation-is-against-the-law-acc/comment-page-1/#comment-231 Anonymous Thu, 25 Aug 2005 06:45:44 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privat#comment-231 <a></a> You are the best. Thank you http://www.bignews.com

You are the best. Thank you http://www.bignews.com

]]> By: Marja-Leena Rathje http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privatisation-is-against-the-law-acc/comment-page-1/#comment-1263 Marja-Leena Rathje Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:05:49 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privat#comment-1263 <a></a> Hi, just found you via Wood s Lot, and enjoyed reading about your background and the descriptions of the Victoria area, so familiar to me! ( I live in the Vancouver area). Boston sounds quite shocking! We were surprised a few years ago to learn that in Finland, private lands are open to public access, provided that nothing is disturbed and you don't go too close to the residence, to assure privacy. Will be back!

Hi, just found you via Wood s Lot, and enjoyed reading about your background and the descriptions of the Victoria area, so familiar to me! ( I live in the Vancouver area). Boston sounds quite shocking!

We were surprised a few years ago to learn that in Finland, private lands are open to public access, provided that nothing is disturbed and you don’t go too close to the residence, to assure privacy.

Will be back!

]]> By: Joel http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privatisation-is-against-the-law-acc/comment-page-1/#comment-1262 Joel Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:46:06 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privat#comment-1262 <a></a> And, incidentally, I don't support that frame of mind, but it impinges on me every day.

And, incidentally, I don’t support that frame of mind, but it impinges on me every day.

]]> By: Joel http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privatisation-is-against-the-law-acc/comment-page-1/#comment-1261 Joel Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:44:51 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2004/04/12/some-canada-us-differences-why-privat#comment-1261 <a></a> Having been raised in California, I remember when voters passed the Coastal Initiative, Tom, and saved the beaches for the rest of us. I'm not so sure that we're all for the open-mindset. The Coastal Initiative was prompted by the actions of the Orange County Board of Supervisors who went along with a private initiative to destroy a historic cove, its wildlife, and a great surfing wave. I don't think of where I live as an extension of the East but a peculiar type of Californianism where freedom means the right to deny others access to the sunlight if you can manage it.

Having been raised in California, I remember when voters passed the Coastal Initiative, Tom, and saved the beaches for the rest of us.

I’m not so sure that we’re all for the open-mindset. The Coastal Initiative was prompted by the actions of the Orange County Board of Supervisors who went along with a private initiative to destroy a historic cove, its wildlife, and a great surfing wave. I don’t think of where I live as an extension of the East but a peculiar type of Californianism where freedom means the right to deny others access to the sunlight if you can manage it.

]]>