<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Timber!&#8221; or &#8220;Timber?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/01/21/timber-or-timber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/01/21/timber-or-timber/</link>
	<description>I am a mongrel - O ma! A gremlin...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:34:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Randall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/01/21/timber-or-timber/comment-page-1/#comment-9875</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/?p=1126#comment-9875</guid>
		<description>XHTML: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timescolonist.com/news/todays-paper/Critics+wary+tall+wood+buildings/1238456/story.html&quot; title=&quot;Critics wary of tall wood buildings&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;

Push to raise height limit for wood-frame structures could create problems, they warn
 
By Richard Watts, Times Colonist
January 31, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XHTML: <a href="http://www.timescolonist.com/news/todays-paper/Critics+wary+tall+wood+buildings/1238456/story.html" title="Critics wary of tall wood buildings" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>Push to raise height limit for wood-frame structures could create problems, they warn</p>
<p>By Richard Watts, Times Colonist<br />
January 31, 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Closed routine or open innovation? Yule Heibel&#8217;s Post Studio © 2003-2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/01/21/timber-or-timber/comment-page-1/#comment-9841</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Closed routine or open innovation? Yule Heibel&#8217;s Post Studio © 2003-2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/?p=1126#comment-9841</guid>
		<description>[...] easy enough to understand the attitude, I suppose. After yesterday&#8217;s UDI luncheon and my &#8220;d&#8217;oh!&#8221; insight into the reactive nature of codes - building codes, but also all the codes related to infrastructure, too - I&#8217;m not surprised [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] easy enough to understand the attitude, I suppose. After yesterday&#8217;s UDI luncheon and my &#8220;d&#8217;oh!&#8221; insight into the reactive nature of codes &#8211; building codes, but also all the codes related to infrastructure, too &#8211; I&#8217;m not surprised [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
