Comments on: Blue Bridge blues http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/04/23/blue-bridge-blues/ I am a mongrel - O ma! A gremlin... Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:34:17 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: » Notes: Traffic volume, hormone levels Yule Heibel’s Post Studio © 2003-2009 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/04/23/blue-bridge-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-10304 » Notes: Traffic volume, hormone levels Yule Heibel’s Post Studio © 2003-2009 Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:22:59 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/?p=1173#comment-10304 [...] When I was at yesterday’s Committee of the Whole at City Hall, I listened to the City’s engineers talk about cars and vehicular traffic, and how it relates to the question of whether or not to keep Victoria’s Johnson Street Bridge (also known as the Blue Bridge). [...] [...] When I was at yesterday’s Committee of the Whole at City Hall, I listened to the City’s engineers talk about cars and vehicular traffic, and how it relates to the question of whether or not to keep Victoria’s Johnson Street Bridge (also known as the Blue Bridge). [...]

]]> By: Yule http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/04/23/blue-bridge-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-10301 Yule Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:05:01 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/?p=1173#comment-10301 I'll write some more about it later. Right now, it looks like it's driven by money - there's Federal money available, and there's a time-limit to how long it's on offer. It doesn't seem like the best way to plan anything, though. I’ll write some more about it later. Right now, it looks like it’s driven by money – there’s Federal money available, and there’s a time-limit to how long it’s on offer. It doesn’t seem like the best way to plan anything, though.

]]> By: Adam http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/2009/04/23/blue-bridge-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-10299 Adam Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:30:44 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/yulelog/?p=1173#comment-10299 Hmm, very interesting. I'm certainly interested to hear what led to this decision. I've never felt that the bridge was particularly lacking. Is it considered a hazard or something? Or are we just looking to throw money at something? --Adam Hmm, very interesting.

I’m certainly interested to hear what led to this decision. I’ve never felt that the bridge was particularly lacking. Is it considered a hazard or something? Or are we just looking to throw money at something?

–Adam

]]>