<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Zeroday 01100100011010010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday</link>
	<description>三一三三七</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on EA could help end DRM by DRM is a security threat &#171; Security For All</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2008/09/25/ea-could-help-end-drm/#comment-3749</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM is a security threat &#171; Security For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/?p=352#comment-3749</guid>
		<description>[...] But at the same time I&#8217;m a software user. I use both open source software (free as in speech because I like to tweak it, and free as in beer because I&#8217;m cheap and I like beer) and commercial software that my wife thinks I spend too much money on. And I hate Digital Rights Management (DRM) software. Hate it. It&#8217;s inconvenient, intrusive and hey - I paid for the product and I don&#8217;t want DRM. For me that is reason enough. Okay, I think most of us can agree that DRM is annoying and intrusive but how is that a threat to information security? Glad you asked. From a recent article on the Harvard Law Zeroday blog: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But at the same time I&#8217;m a software user. I use both open source software (free as in speech because I like to tweak it, and free as in beer because I&#8217;m cheap and I like beer) and commercial software that my wife thinks I spend too much money on. And I hate Digital Rights Management (DRM) software. Hate it. It&#8217;s inconvenient, intrusive and hey - I paid for the product and I don&#8217;t want DRM. For me that is reason enough. Okay, I think most of us can agree that DRM is annoying and intrusive but how is that a threat to information security? Glad you asked. From a recent article on the Harvard Law Zeroday blog: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Basic Ubuntu Server Hardening by Not So Wise</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2008/03/29/basic-ubuntu-server-hardening/#comment-3190</link>
		<dc:creator>Not So Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2008/03/29/basic-ubuntu-server-hardening/#comment-3190</guid>
		<description>[...] below are steps to set it up for your on your server. Good references and further readings at this, this and this forum threadInstall shorewallapt-get install shorewall shorewall-commonchange directorycd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] below are steps to set it up for your on your server. Good references and further readings at this, this and this forum threadInstall shorewallapt-get install shorewall shorewall-commonchange directorycd [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wishlist: Scapy traceroute object pickling by amitg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2008/07/27/wishlist-scapy-traceroute-object-pickling/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>amitg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2008/07/27/wishlist-scapy-traceroute-object-pickling/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>very interesting :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creating a chroot environment in Ubuntu Edgey by Geek Bazaar &#187; chrooted ssh environment on ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/11/14/creating-a-chroot-environment-in-ubuntu-edgey/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Bazaar &#187; chrooted ssh environment on ubuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/11/14/creating-a-chroot-environment-in-ubun#comment-191</guid>
		<description>[...] here. Looks like a good tutorial..    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here. Looks like a good tutorial..    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fake Torrents and Trackers 09/2007 by Fake Torrents and Trackers &#171; General Headquarters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/09/30/fake-torrents-and-trackers-092007/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Torrents and Trackers &#171; General Headquarters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 01:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/09/30/fake-torrents-and-trackers-092007/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>[...] Torrents and&#160;Trackers  These torrents and trackers are reported as fake and setup by the MPAA and RIAA or their affiliates. Any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Torrents and&nbsp;Trackers  These torrents and trackers are reported as fake and setup by the MPAA and RIAA or their affiliates. Any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MediaDefender Fails to Maintain Security by Geek Bazaar &#187; The Biggest ever BitTorrent Leak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/09/17/mediadefender-fails-to-maintain-security/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Bazaar &#187; The Biggest ever BitTorrent Leak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/09/17/mediadefender-fails-to-maintain-secur#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sending your IM logs to Tech Support by zeno</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/07/31/sending-your-im-logs-to-tech-support/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>zeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/07/31/sending-your-im-logs-to-tech-support/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Markspace?  Responsive?  Remarkable!  Maybe one day they'll get around to fixing the various MissingSync Palm problems that people have been complaining about for ages.  No, a paid upgrade to version 6 is not a "fix," especially since it doesn't fix half of 'em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markspace?  Responsive?  Remarkable!  Maybe one day they&#8217;ll get around to fixing the various MissingSync Palm problems that people have been complaining about for ages.  No, a paid upgrade to version 6 is not a &#8220;fix,&#8221; especially since it doesn&#8217;t fix half of &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beansec 8 (or 9.. I&#8217;ve lost count) by Matasano Chargen &#187; CitySec, Yo! Your May Meetupdates!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/04/16/beansec-8-or-9-ive-lost-count/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Matasano Chargen &#187; CitySec, Yo! Your May Meetupdates!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 21:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/04/16/beansec-8-or-9-ive-lost-count/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] Are you in Boston? Are you looking for a CitySec meetup? You want BeanSec. You got BeanSec! It&#8217;s May 16th, at Enormous Room in Cambridge. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are you in Boston? Are you looking for a CitySec meetup? You want BeanSec. You got BeanSec! It&#8217;s May 16th, at Enormous Room in Cambridge. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aspects of the DMCA posting &#8220;The Key&#8221; violates by zeroday</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/05/03/aspects-of-the-dmca-posting-the-key-violates/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 17:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/05/03/aspects-of-the-dmca-posting-the-key-v#comment-71</guid>
		<description>That is the most grammatically awkward title I've ever written.  Should read, Posting "the key" violates these aspects of the DMCA.  Also, see Ethan's post for a better breakdown.
http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1410</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the most grammatically awkward title I&#8217;ve ever written.  Should read, Posting &#8220;the key&#8221; violates these aspects of the DMCA.  Also, see Ethan&#8217;s post for a better breakdown.<br />
<a href="http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1410" rel="nofollow">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1410</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AACS starts sending take down notices over Processing Key by Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/04/29/aacs-starts-sending-take-down-notices/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/zeroday/2007/04/29/aacs-starts-sending-take-down-notices#comment-70</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 and What it Stands For...&lt;/strong&gt;

What&#39;s so important about that 128bit hex string? Well that just happens to be the processing key...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 and What it Stands For&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>What&#39;s so important about that 128bit hex string? Well that just happens to be the processing key&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
