In the long run paying for wi-fi in your hotel will be like paying to use the toilet or the heater. You won’t. Meanwhile, it would be nice if it were easy, cheap, good, or at least two out of those three.
Right now I’m 0-for-3 at my hotel in Amsterdamn. I just had to call for tech support. The front desk is no help. They punt it to Swisscom, the provider, to which I paid ¤22 ($34.23) for 24 hours, starting this afternoon. When I came back from a sojourn away from the hotel, Swisscom wanted a login and password, and told me the front desk would have it. The desk didn’t, so they got me Swisscom, which looked up my credit card payment and got me a login/pw that the service supposedly gave me on the website the first time around, but I missed it.
Anyway, we’re back up. With a download speed of 384Kbps and an upload speed is 179kbps, I haven’t paid more for less since the worst days of dial-up.
-
There must be a better way, indeed.
I am confounded by the inverse relationship between hotel prices and free wifi. Expensive hotels charge you for wifi, cheap ones don’t. Even when they’re under the same corporate umbrella. Ritz Carlton? Charges for internet. (Not even wifi!) Courtyard by Marriott? Free wifi. Both part of the Marriott Corporation. Go figure.
The weirdest thing I’ve run into (not including lousy connections) is the 4:00pm 24-hour start/finish time at the Doubletree in Norfolk, VA. If you log on at 3:59 p.m., you pay $9.95 for one minute of internet usage. If you log on at 4:01 p.m., you pay the same amount for 23 hours and 59 minutes.
-
I think you should name and shame the hotel. Amsterdam has become one of the worst connected cities in the world for this kind of thing – and they supposedly hosting the International Broadcasting Convention in September each year. Connectivity is a nightmare. Looking forward to your talk this afternoon
-
What do you think of ventures that attempt to persuade everyone and their dog to only permit members of a select club to use their suitably permissive wireless access points (in exchange for a share of the membership fee, and possibly a bandwidth consumption fee), if they otherwise keep their wifi access points private?
Why doesn’t everyone just leave their access points open and cut out the admin and middleman? Game theory anyone?
Or is everyone petrified by drive-by pariahs? (hackers/id thieves/terrorists/paedophiles)
-
Just browsing to find an Amsterdam hotel for the Picnic conference in september – thanks for the warnings
And I just got back from a trip to Germany – and I can strongly recommend that you go for SAS Radisson if you ever go to Dresden. They had free wifi everywhere and they made no fuss about it and it worked absolutely brilliant – just like the hairdryer – which we also didn’t pay extra for
!


11 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/06/01/theres-gotta-be-a-better-way/trackback/