Subscribe to feed
‹ Quotes du jour • Updike at rest ›
January 28, 2009 in Art, Blogging, Life | 6 comments
I dunno if this is a spam or not, but I got a chuckle out of it, so I let it fly.
Leonid on January 28, 2009 at 2:57 pm
yes it is a relatively new kind of spam: posting weird/nonsense comments along with a link to a website that seem unrelated – looks funky and innocent for the blog owners but still a spam.
This “kinserino”-dude posting links to that website all over the web: http://www.google.com/search?q=kinserino
Shawn Powers on January 28, 2009 at 6:04 pm
That quality does make me satisfy too.
Doc Searls on January 28, 2009 at 6:15 pm
So, should I kill it now?
Mike Warot on January 28, 2009 at 7:13 pm
You could pull the hypertext out of the entry, with a link back to this post as explanation.
Adam Fields on January 29, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Funny spam is still spam. Kill the link.
Doc Searls on January 29, 2009 at 5:19 pm
I deleted the name, email and URL, leaving the text.
Comments are now closed.
@anildash @gapingvoid Yep, we kinda got stampeded on that one.
About 6 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter for Websites
@gapingvoid @GabrielleNYC We did? What kind of bubbles? (Late here... brain not the best.)
The new face of New Jersey: bit.ly/1vYOrrF pic.twitter.com/PMMLb9u77x
About 7 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@jeffjarvis @JPBarlow Thought: publisher and advertiser appetite for "content" is what sphinctered the paid #journalism market to near-zip.
Yesterday from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@jeffjarvis And @JPBarlow once said, long ago, "I didn't start hearing about content until the container business felt threatened."
Powered by WordPress and Tarski