Subscribe to feed
‹ Quotes du jour • Updike at rest ›
January 28, 2009 in Art, Blogging, Life | 6 comments
I dunno if this is a spam or not, but I got a chuckle out of it, so I let it fly.
Leonid on January 28, 2009 at 2:57 pm
yes it is a relatively new kind of spam: posting weird/nonsense comments along with a link to a website that seem unrelated – looks funky and innocent for the blog owners but still a spam.
This “kinserino”-dude posting links to that website all over the web: http://www.google.com/search?q=kinserino
Shawn Powers on January 28, 2009 at 6:04 pm
That quality does make me satisfy too.
Doc Searls on January 28, 2009 at 6:15 pm
So, should I kill it now?
Mike Warot on January 28, 2009 at 7:13 pm
You could pull the hypertext out of the entry, with a link back to this post as explanation.
Adam Fields on January 29, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Funny spam is still spam. Kill the link.
Doc Searls on January 29, 2009 at 5:19 pm
I deleted the name, email and URL, leaving the text.
Comments are now closed.
@firefox Yes, and it's important. Please check out mzl.la/1KAegmQ folks.
About 42 minutes ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@Moataz_ZS @mozilla @firefox If next-gen #contentblocking gave you a choice between #safeads and #noads, which would you pick?
About an hour ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@johnnyryan @firefox @jeffjarvis In other words, it's not just up to advertising's supply side alone. Users need to step past ad blocking.
@johnnyryan @firefox @jeffjarvis Three parties need to move forward to convergence and engagement: users, publishers and advertisers. #vrm
About 2 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@firefox Tracking is what made #contentblocking hockey-stick starting in '12: j.mp/bcott
Powered by WordPress and Tarski